Experience the Decision Economics Difference for yourself.
The Political Business Cycle: More Risk This Time?
- Since stock prices usually rise in election years, incumbency and/or close races do not guarantee a down stock market.
- Unfortunately, political (and economic) risk may be rising this presidential election year, which offers the starkest choice between major party candidates since 1896. It may prove to be a tight for a number of reasons.
- Two-term (Democrat) incumbency has been a distinct disadvantage as voters usually tire of the incumbent party.
- Trump has been an effective and unpredictable campaigner compared to the lackluster Clinton. He may very well tack to the center to gain votes.
- A much slower expansion with little change in the unemployment rate may also prove a handicap to Clinton. Even a small rise in the unemployment rate has meant defeat for the incumbent party.
- Most investors think Trump represents too much change and Clinton, the “safe choice” will prevail. However, if the election race should tighten, a close race may present investors with “too much” uncertainty and a reason to dump stocks.
Not yet a Decision Economics member? Click here to register for a FREE 30 day trial.
If you are already a member, click here to login.